Liberals say abortion is a woman’s choice, but can’t reconcile that with being against choice in any other matter. Today I’m not talking about abortion, but I am talking about authoritarian Democratic candidates who want to completely reorganize wealth in this country and clamp a harness on your financial nuts.

Hillary Clinton’s healthcare plan, which aims for universal coverage, would punish you for not having coverage even if you could afford not to have it.

How would she deal with pesky non-covereds?

“I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”

It’s not enough to ruin healthcare by paying everyone’s tab; apparently you have to force people into this commie BS. I guess there’s no other way to get people to agree to such idiotic ideas. It’s not enough that they redistribute the wealth: they punish you if you don’t want any part. Americans used to revolt for this kind of thing.

I don’t know what’s worse; the policy or the idea that the person who has it is a leading candidate to be our most powerful politician. Honestly; does this policy resonate with any of you? Is anyone listening to what the Democrat candidates are actually for?

Oddly, Hillary has used the “accept my plan or pay the penalty” angle against Obama; as if his healthcare plan isn’t truly universal because it doesn’t require German shock troops. Instead, all we ever hear about the Democrats is quabbling over who likes who more and who said what when.

Irrelevant. Somebody, please, dig into their policies and explain to Americans what the actual implications of HillaryCare are. I don’t see anyone flying to Canada to have their babies.

Visit the BPN Political Discussion Boards

Did you like this post? Subscribe to the BipolarNation feed.

You can also receive the latest BipolarNation.com posts delivered to your e-mail inbox! Subscribe here.