Comments on: Obama Administration Kicks American Nuclear Energy in the Face http://www.bipolarnation.com/2009/11/05/obama-administration-kicks-american-nuclear-energy-in-the-face/ Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:44:24 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Dan Kenitz http://www.bipolarnation.com/2009/11/05/obama-administration-kicks-american-nuclear-energy-in-the-face/comment-page-1/#comment-44846 Dan Kenitz Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:42:46 +0000 http://www.bipolarnation.com/?p=1609#comment-44846 Why is it weak? And I was complimenting the French on their use of nuclear power at the end there. Why is it weak? And I was complimenting the French on their use of nuclear power at the end there.

]]> By: JB http://www.bipolarnation.com/2009/11/05/obama-administration-kicks-american-nuclear-energy-in-the-face/comment-page-1/#comment-44844 JB Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:37:58 +0000 http://www.bipolarnation.com/?p=1609#comment-44844 Yucca Mountain is a weak solution, a relic of a distant era of nuclear power thinking. The best solution is to reprocess the waste at regional refining facilities. It cuts down on both waste and the need to refine and import fissile material. Mock them if you, but <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/french.html" rel="nofollow">the French</a> do nuclear power much better than the U.S. does. Yucca Mountain is a weak solution, a relic of a distant era of nuclear power thinking. The best solution is to reprocess the waste at regional refining facilities. It cuts down on both waste and the need to refine and import fissile material.

Mock them if you, but the French do nuclear power much better than the U.S. does.

]]>